Not sure about green light but still, very cool

“Biochemist Pierre Calleja has a solution to reducing carbon emissions that doesn’t require us to cut back on our use of carbon-producing devices. Calleja has developed a lighting system that requires no electricity for power. Instead it draws CO2 from the atmosphere and uses it to produce light as well as oxygen as a byproduct. The key ingredient to this eco-friendly light? Algae. Certain types of algae can feed off of organic carbon as well as sunlight, and in the process produce carbohydrate energy for themselves as well as oxygen as a waste product. Cajella’s lamps consist of algae-filled water along with a light and battery system. During the day the algae produce energy from sunlight that is then stored in the batteries. Then at night the energy is used to power the light. However, as the algae can also produce energy from carbon, sunlight isn’t required for the process to work. That means such lights can be placed where there is no natural light and the air will effectively be cleaned on a daily basis.”

 

http://www.geek.com/articles/geek-cetera/biochemist-creates-co2-eating-light-that-runs-on-algae-2012055/

 

My girls Skydiving

Courtesy of Ford Escape

1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Pxtj9lL81fE

2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vQFBkaSkp5s

Earthscraper… besides the issue of flooding count me in!

http://www.ecomagination.com/earthscraper-concept-takes-sustainable-design-underground

 

Advances in Battery technology!

I often think that “storage” of electricity will be one of the biggest issues we face with our gradual move away from fossil fuels.  I find the following articles incredibly exciting.

 

Aluminum Battery technology

MIT’s new battery

Ultra Capacitors

MIT’s new lithium Battery

New Battery Technology is Super Geeky and Ultra Powerful

Bill Gates on the future of energy.

Bill Gates on the future of energy

Camping in Montana, N. Dakota

The brother, his family and ours want to go camping with his trailer, tent and ours. We want to go to though we will just tent. We want to camp in Montana and North Dakota. With Mount Rushmore etc, there should be some good camping available. Any ideas where we can stop on the way from Calgary if we are heading to Rushmore?

Also, we wamt to go see Rushmore, thw progress on Crazy Horse, Yellowstone, Devils’ Tower; what else is there to see?

Tags: ,

Wild art from my little girls

Take a look at the great art work from my little girls!

Password security for real people

Repel those old school best practice junkies!

If you read about the studies on security incidents, 80% are caused by internal staff and this really needs to be kept in mind when exploring this topic. Risk management philosophies will suggest you cannot prevent all risks so you have to focus one most common ones or more specifically, ones that put you at highest risk. Translated then, with respect to password security, the focus must be for us to create and install password standards strong enough to keep from guessed or quickly being brute forced but the biggest focus is that passwords need to be simple enough to keep people from writing them down.

We need to install password controls for our users which protect people from themselves but balance humanities limited abilities to remember things without writing them down.

My suggestions are:

  1. Allow user and go so far as to encourage them to use the SAME password on systems Why: To improve security of our world, you must take into account humanity or at least consider what 90% (or at least 50%) of the world is capable of technically or from a environment perspective. Lets face it, most of the people outside of IT see the endless pile of access accounts and passwords as job creation for IT people. The remaining people have no knowledge at all as to the risk the they are creating for themselves, us or their employers. The knee jerk reaction from the typical IT person is that we need to protect people from themselves for their own good and I agree – somewhat!
  2. Make your passwords and setup your systems to require 7 char or longer (to infinity keeping in mind some systems limit this). Sentences are a great idea. However a password that is mandated too long will ensure people struggle to come up with a password and if they struggle to think of a password, they will struggle to remember it.  If they struggle to remember it, they will write it down.  Bad.
  3. Require “strong” passwords. This to me means defined by me as requiring upper/lower/symbol.  Do not get more complicated such as disallowing a number at the front or behind.  This again ensures that the password will be hard to remember again.
  4. Purchase or build systems that use pass thru authentication (or get rid of passwords and move biometrics or some other 2 factor based solution)
  5. If you work at a company/corporation and build systems, try to use central password directories such as AD or some other federated system. This makes it easy for people as they will have less passwords to remember and you still have control of what they see by installing role based authorization.
  6. DO NOT activate password rotation despite what the security propeller-heads, and robots say at SANS etc.  Think of your bank; do you HAVE to change your PIN with them?????  The key here is that you have to get people to treat their password like a PIN and protect it.  Only encourage people change their password if they are worried that it may be compromised. If you must turn on rotation due to audit or regulatory compliance, ensure that all your password directories for all of your system password expire all at the same time for a user so that they change their passwords in one fell swoop again minimizing the chance that they need to write them down

What IT professionals need to realize is that our users cannot relate to malware zombies that steal passwords and have no capacity to remember the myriad of usernames and password combinations we submit them to. We need to disregard old school theories around security that suggest all password “best practices” need to be turned on and set to the max. All we do is ensure that people, including many of us reading these articles wil be compelled to write them down submitting themselves to potential internal incidents which are far more likely. Finally, we must educate our less technical people around us that there are real risks out there but also spend time to show them how they can fall victim to the risks and explain what they can do with simple behaviour to save their skin.

How can this be?!

Okay, this summer totally sucked. Its currently 5 degrees Celsius in Calgary!  The weather has been so crappy for so long the girls have come to the conclusion that it must be winter soon and they wanted to watch our perennial Christmas favourite,  Polar Express.  Okay, I love the movie too but it ain’t winter yet!!!!

Tags: , , ,

Convienience-based waste of resources

I like to ponder people’s perception of convenience, needs and wants when it comes to vehicle choices.  What specifically I see is a growing trend of convenience based waste of resources.  You should know that I just recently changed from a 2007 Pontiac Montana that gets 12.3L/100km in the city for $500 bucks at 500 bucks a month to a Mazda 5 that gets 9.5L/100km and costs me 422 per month. Curb weight of Pontiac 37oolbs; Mazda 3466.

It seems convenience is a major factor currently getting  in the way of people select their autos.  I don’t ever remember having a discussion with anyone stating that they bought a car because monthly payments on an SUV are 25% higher than a similar featured car or that cars help with energy conservation and pollution reduction because they are lighter, smaller engines and are smaller.  I’m not going to enter into debate about CO2 or ice caps here.  It just confuses me that many people I know, at least in Calgary, continue to buy massive Trucks,  SUV’s, and dare I say Mini-vans.  Most often, they state they “need” the space when in my opinion they haven’t asked themselves the hard questions  like “is this a need or a want or how often am I going to need more room than what a normal car trunk can offer.”

When I ask people if they have compared how much money they can save by purchasing a Car vs. an SUV, they strangely assume they are about the same price.  When I ask them  fuel economy and its tie to the automobiles curb weight, they are are unaware that they can save a great deal of money on fuel, and purchase costs by buying smaller vehicles.   Most people indicate they have not looked at cars recently because cars do not have enough space for their family activities.  But when I ask them how frequently they have taken out the seats in their minivan and filled it to the gills, most are hard pressed to say that they ever have.

My stand on this is that you should purchase a auto that has enough space for  the activities that are most common occurring within the family/business.  I am not saying that everyone should have one of those Smart cars, no, I am saying that maybe its not necessary for a family to have a Truck and a large SUV when maybe the SUV and a Car is enough.  The families that have 2 boys in hockey and go to practice 5 days a week clearly have a need for a big vehicle with the massive bags of equipment; I am more focused on convenience-based waste.  Another example of this is the sheer quantities of trucks in Western Canada that are driven to office buildings every day only because its owner needs 6 bags of dirt from Canadian Tire every spring.  The other argument that I am tired of is that they are safer, especially in winter; physics does not agree with this argument!  Why is it then that on QEII, I see an equal share of SUV’s, Trucks and cars in the ditch during the winter storms.  Could it be that people are counting on the AWD/4wd features and should be counting on snow tires, driving at safe times, good safe slow driving or public transit during storms?

If you have so much money that you do not care how much these conveniences cost you I think you are lying to your self.  I think that everyone I know could use another $100 or $150 a month ($1200 or 1800 a year).  I think that everyone (no matter how much money they make) should always strive to evaluate the decisions that they are making in the name of convenience.   Is having the ability to pick up a 4×8 sheet of plywood once every 2 years really worth paying  paying an additional 12oo a year for that convenience????

Check back in a while for connections from this topic to my two other topics Thinking in dimensions and Reducing your you, your family’s,  and your company’s dependency on disadvantaged energy sources (as discussed in “1000 barrels a second“.)

Tags: , ,